show·down /ˈʃoʊˌdaʊn/ [shoh-doun]
–noun
1. the laying down of one’s cards, face upward, in a card game, esp. poker.
2. a conclusive settlement of an issue, difference, etc., in which all resources, power, or the like, are used; decisive confrontation: An international showdown was inevitable.
—Synonyms 2. crisis, climax, encounter, clash.
Source: dictionary.com
Although the showdown we’re about to witness is limited to Chicago’s North Edgebrook neighborhood, it is indeed inevitable. It evolves around the building at 6000 W. Touhy Ave. which houses the Frozen Ropes baseball training center, Edgebrook Bank, and Athletico Rehab Center. This building was newly constructed a couple of years ago, and has been the subject of a highly poisoned relationship between the residents of a 94 home subdivision encompassing Meade, McVicker, and Sherwin Avenues and the owner of 6000 W. Touhy, Gus Tountas (Full disclosure: My family and I are residents of this subdivision). Below, is an aerial photo of the site in question.
History
The original zoning designation of this property was B2-1, when it housed medical offices which were eventually torn down. In 2003, the property was up-zoned to B4-1, in order to accommodate the current owner’s request to build a structure that would be able to house a baseball academy. Actually, the owner had sought a C-zoning (a higher zone than the baseball academy required), but the residents fought hard to limit the zoning change to B4-1. At the time, the owner’s representatives (architects, developers, attorneys) gave numerous presentations during meetings with the residents of the affected community, Ald. Doherty, and the 41st Ward Zoning Advisory Board at the Olympia Park Fieldhouse, assuring everybody that no further development would be proposed for this site once the structure for the baseball academy was built. The preparation of traffic studies was promised to the residents and to the Alderman. The residents never saw any of these traffic studies. The parking requirements were pegged at approx. 75 cars which were noted as adequate and sufficient, per the developer himself. Moreover, maintenance of “open space” between this property and its residential neighbors was promised. In return for having been granted B4-1 zoning rights, the owner had to agree to abide by certain restrictive covenants. The 78,000 sqft. structure was eventually built, but in late 2004, when the Chicago Zoning Ordinance was revised from the ground up, 6000 W Touhy was automatically re-classified as a B3-1 zone (Community Shopping Center).
Three Years Later
Gus Tountas, the owner of 6000 W Touhy, has been renting office space to Edgebrook Bank, and to Athletico. At the east end of the building, he himself operates the Frozen Ropes Baseball Academy. In 2007, the residents of the subdivision north of Touhy were informed that Mr. Tountas had applied for a permit to construct a 300-car garage on his property, consisting of an underground level, and two stories above grade. This garage was to be built on the part of the property which is currently designated the outdoor parking area for approx. 75 vehicles. Residents of the subdivision met with Ald. Doherty several times last year to discuss this situation which is unacceptable to the residents. Ald. Doherty had explained during one of these meetings that Mr. Tountas had approached him with an inquiry about the possibility of building a 300-car garage at 6050 W. Touhy, were Mr. Tountas to purchase that property. 6050 W Touhy is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Touhy and Meade Avenues and is owned by a church (Evangelical Students Fellowship). Ald. Doherty made it clear to Mr. Tountas that he would not allow him to build a garage on that property, were he to purchase it.
Mr. Tountas subsequently went to Plan B, and applied for a permit for the garage on his own property. Problems crept up with his application because apparently the rear setback requirements mandated by the zoning ordinance could not be met. Throughout this, Mr. Tountas has been consulting with the venerable Jim Banks, whom he had presumably hired to take care of the “problem”.
Why The Need For A 300-Car Garage?
This is the question residents have been asking themselves and Alderman Doherty, but nobody has had an answer. The businesses that are currently operating at 6000 W Touhy sure would not have a need for that many parking spaces. Mr. Tountas’ lips have been sealed, and the attorney that he has been sending to the Zoning Advisory Board meetings with the residents, hasn’t had any answers either. Finally, a few weeks ago, the residents of the subdivision decided to organize a petition to have 6000 W Touhy downzoned to B1-1 (Neighborhood Shopping Center). Over 90 signatures were collected and forwarded to Ald. Doherty. The ball has been in the court of the Zoning Advisory board ever since, which first held a meeting on May 7, 2008 to discuss this petition with the residents. At the conclusion of that meeting, Ald. Doherty promised to contact the City Zoning Administrator to inquire whether a 300-car garage would be permitted under any of the B-zoning classifications. That meeting also brought to light the Alderman’s hesitation to downzone the property to B1-1. He’d much rather downzone it to B2-1, arguing that [sic] he’d hate to take away people’s property rights.
And what about the rights of the neighboring residents, Mr. Alderman, who would have to endure a massive clogging of their subdivision, due to 300 cars attempting to exit the subdivision with a traffic light on Meade Ave. that has a 2-minute red/20-second green cycle? And please remember, Meade Ave. is the only legitimate ingress/egress point for this shopping center. The east gate entrance of the center faces an easement on Center Point Road that is leased by Mr. Tountas. We have witnessed in the past that the owner of the easement has barricaded the east entrance of the center for one reason or another, leaving Meade Ave. as the only ingress/egress points. Take a look at
the picture below. It shows a 5-car backup on Meade Ave., waiting at the red light, at a time when we don’t even have the 300-car garage yet. Now, allow me to paint a picture here: Imagine about 80 cars attempting to exit from the center on to Meade Ave., all at the same time, with a 2-minute red light. Mayhem? You bet! And I’m not even talking about the noise and the exhaust fumes of the idling engines that would pollute the lungs of dozens of children that live in our subdivision. How ’bout a traffic study?
The Smoking Gun
The second meeting of the residents with Ald. Doherty and the Zoning Advisory Board regarding this issue was scheduled for June 4, 2008. Ald. Doherty reported that he had contacted the office of Chicago’s zoning administrator Patty Scudiero with an inquiry as to whether or not a 300-car parking garage on the site at 6000 W Touhy Ave. would be permissible, in terms of the zoning ordinance. Alas, he hadn’t received an answer yet.
One of the residents of the subdivision, had been proactive though and had done a little research of her own on the cityofchicago.org website, prior to the second meeting. And what she found there, was a big piece of the puzzle. Take a look at this:
Mr. Tountas has been quietly filing a permit for the operation of a health club at 6000 W Touhy, apparently to replace the Frozen Ropes Baseball Academy operation. Rumors are, it’s for “L A Fitness”. However, if you look at the status of the permit, you’ll notice that it was denied on May 29, 2008. No one knows why. But the revelation of this piece of news angered Ald. Doherty to no end, particularly, because he had spoken with Mr. Tountas’ attorney Jim Banks in the morning, who never mentioned anything to the Alderman about these plans. Tountas’ attorney present at the meeting didn’t know anything about this either (at least, so he claims).
Ald. Doherty throws down the gauntlet
This is not the first time that Mr. Tountas has shown nothing but contempt for Ald. Doherty, let alone the residents of the adjacent community. Apparently, the construction of the building was supposed to be done with the help of union workers, but Mr. Tountas ended up hiring non-union labor. Certainly less expensive for him, but major headaches for the Alderman who had to respond to angry union phone calls afterwards. For months on end, residents had to listen to picketing union workers voicing their discontent with loud bullhorns, as early as 7:00 am.
In the winter of 2006/2007, Mr. Tountas hired a company that drilled a hole in his parking lot close to Meade Ave., and subsequently pierced a gas main. About 30 Peoples Energy trucks, along with an army of Peoples Energy field technicians were on the scene, trying to repair the damage throughout the day. Of course, the gas supply to the entire subdivision had to be suspended for a whole day. In the winter. Some residents’ front yards had to be completely dug up. The company that pierced the gas line disappeared from the scene, as quickly as they had shown up. Peoples Energy certainly doesn’t fix problems that are caused by their customers, for free, so they turned to Mr. Tountas. He pointed the finger at his contractor who in turn told Peoples Energy that they merely dug a hole where they were told by Mr. Tountas. Not sure where they stand on that discussion, at the moment. But the main travesty is that the residents who were left without heat and other gas-driven necessities in the middle of the winter, didn’t even receive as much as a letter of apology from Mr. Tountas.
So, Ald. Doherty, threw down the gauntlet last Wednesday night, and instructed Mr. Tountas’ attorney in no uncertain terms to let his client know that the Advisory Board expects to see Mr. Tountas in person at the next Advisory Board meeting on July 2, 2008, in order to hear what his plans are for 6000 W Touhy. Should Mr. Tountas fail to show up, Mr. Doherty will downzone the property to B1-1.
Print This











4 responses thus far ↓
1 JB // Jun 11, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Thanks for the history of the 6000 W. Touhy site. The owner’s recent conduct makes it easy to see why he built such an ill-fitting structure on that land in the first place. I would welcome a new health club in the neighborhood (The Y just doesn’t cut it with its dated facilities and sandpapery towels), but if they aren’t able to create additional access to/from Touhy, that facility would be a nightmare of its own. Hopefully the alderman will stand up for your rights in what’s already a difficult situation for you and your neighbors.
2 Markus Azadeh // Jun 11, 2008 at 3:08 pm
I was torn, as to whether or not I ought to write about this story at all, given the fact that I am affected as a resident, myself. But given the magnitude of this shopping center, and the zoning controversies attached to it, let alone the fact that it is located in 60646, I felt compelled to weigh in. I full well realize that the owner of this property has invested a large amount of money in it, and naturally needs a return. However, even in that capacity, there are certain responsibilities that he had previously agreed to shoulder, even before ground was broken, and one of them was that he would not subject the property (and the residents of the adjacent subdivision) to any higher-intensity uses, other than what was proposed, in terms of the baseball academy. He now wants to change the rules, for reasons that only he is aware of. This is unacceptable.
The residents of the subdivision are first and foremost concerned with the protection of their children and themselves from traffic accidents, the chance of which would naturally increase if we allowed the amount of vehicles frequenting Touhy/Meade Ave. to more than triple. As it is, we’ve had five or six traffic accidents at that intersection ever since this building was constructed, one of them involving a fatality. Obviously, a curb cut off of Touhy Ave is out of the question, because the building sits so close to the road (which is one of the factors that explains the high rate of accidents at that intersection - drivers just can’t see around the building well enough, see the last picture). Hence, the only possible ingress/egress point is Meade Ave. The easement on Center Point Road is just that: an easement which could be revoked at the easement owner’s will, and then we’re really just left with Meade Ave.
Thanks for chiming in, JB.
3 mcviker resident // Aug 14, 2008 at 5:05 pm
any one notice gus paid no taxes on his building its still listed as a medicial building that is exempted? go to cook county assessor office interactive map still shows pic of old medicial building not the new building. did he commit fraud not paying by claiming its still a medicial building? http://www.cookcountyassessor.com/
4 Markus Azadeh // Aug 14, 2008 at 6:55 pm
A couple of remarks here, McVicker resident: Firstly, believe it or not, Mr. Tountas actually has not had any property tax liabilities on 6000 W Touhy, neither in tax year 2006, nor for the first installment of tax year 2007. How do I know? I pulled the info from the Cook County Treasurer’s office (see pics below). His prop. tax bill was exactly zero! I know it’s hard to fathom, and I certainly can’t explain why this is the case. Someone who has more time than I do, would have to dig into this.



The website of the Cook County Assessor certainly does show the picture of the old medical building, but that’s a picture taken by the Assessor’s office, for which Mr. Tountas is not actually responsible. In fact, I don’t think that anything sinister has been going on with that, because when the application for the new building was filed and approved, obviously, the Assessor’s office would have been notified, albeit with a time lag. But it’s now what, 3-4 years since this building has been constructed? Why were the most recent tax bills zero? Also of note (from the public records): Ownership of the building was granted from Harris Bank to two grantees named “6000″ and “sixzerozerozero” on July 15, 2008 (see pic below). Does anyone know what’s up with that?
Leave a Comment
Please note: Comments that are off-topic, or personal attacks will likely be removed at our discretion.